Contract No. KLN/2013/16
Environmental Monitoring Works for Kai Tak
Development
Appendix L – Summary of environmental
complaint, warning, summon and notification of successful prosecution
Reporting Month: April 2015
Contract
No. KLN/2013/16
|
Log Ref. |
Location |
Received Date |
Details of Complaint/warning/summon and
prosecution |
Investigation/Mitigation Action |
Status |
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Works Contract within KTD
KDO, CEDD projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
(Yes/No) |
|
CV/2013/02 |
No |
No |
No |
|
KL/2010/02 |
No |
No |
No |
|
KL/2010/03 |
No |
No |
No |
|
KL/2011/01 |
No |
No |
No |
|
KL/2012/02 |
No |
No |
No |
|
KL/2012/03 |
No |
No |
No |
DSD projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
(Yes/No) |
|
DC/2010/03 |
No |
No |
No |
|
DC/2011/04 |
No |
No |
No |
WSD project
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
(Yes/No) |
|
3/WSD/08 |
No |
No |
No |
|
6/WSD/08 |
No |
No |
No |
|
7/WSD/08 |
No |
No |
No |
|
8/WSD/08 |
No |
No |
No |
ArchSD projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions (Yes/No) |
|
SS A501 |
No |
No |
No |
|
SS B507 |
No |
No |
No |
|
SS
W304 |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
TC Y305 |
No |
No |
No |
CLP projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions (Yes/No) |
|
Kai Tak Cruise Terminal
Cable Tunnel |
No |
No |
No |
|
CLPP (132kV cable
installation) |
No |
No |
No |
EMSD
projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions (Yes/No) |
|
1020EM12A |
No |
No |
No |
MTR projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions (Yes/No) |
|
1107 |
No |
No |
No |
|
1108 |
No |
No |
No |
|
1108A |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
1109 |
Yes |
No |
No |
HKHA
projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions(Yes/No) |
|
|
20140264 |
No |
No |
No |
|
URA
projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
(Yes/No) |
|
|
New Kowloon Inland Lot No. 6515 |
No |
No |
No |
|
COHL
projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
(Yes/No) |
|
|
New Kowloon Inland Lot No. 6516 & 6517 |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
K&K Property
projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
(Yes/No) |
|
|
New Kowloon Inland Lot No. 6525 |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
KWIH projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
(Yes/No) |
|
|
New Kowloon Inland Lot No. 6526 |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Poly Property
projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
(Yes/No) |
|
|
New Kowloon Inland Lot No. 6527 |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Wheelock
Properties projects
|
Contract
No. |
Record
of Complaint (Yes/No) |
Record
of Warning (Yes/No) |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
(Yes/No) |
|
|
New Kowloon Inland Lot No. 6541 |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Cumulative
Statistics on Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
|
Works
Contract / TGLA / STT |
Record
of Complaint |
Record
of Warning |
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions |
|
Contract No.
KLN/2013/16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Works Contract
within KTD |
21 |
0 |
1 |
|
TGLA / STT |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Complaint
Log
|
EPD Complaint Ref No. |
Date of Complaint |
Contract Involved |
Contractor |
Complaint Details |
Investigation / |
Status |
|
14-29958 |
1/12/2014 |
MTR Contract No.
1107 |
CW-SELI JV |
Complainant
said some abnormal machine noise was heard from the said construction site at
night. |
A
complaint regarding noise emitted from submersible pump during restricted
hours was referred by EPD on 15 Jan 15 (complaint case ref. no.:14-29958). Investigation
was conducted by the Contract ET. In spite operation of submersible pump was
covered by valid CNP, CSJV agreed to remove the concerned submersible pump to
avoid nuisance to the nearby residents. The complaint case was found to be
project-related. |
Closed |
|
14-31154 |
15/12/2014 |
Complainant
said abnormal noise was heard from the said construction site and she said
dust emission was observed. |
Investigation
was conducted by the Contract ET. Findings from the investigation showed the
alarm noise was suspected to be produced from the drop bar of the site
ingress. Therefore CSJV agreed to omit the alarm system to minimize noise
nuisance to the nearby residents. For
the dust issue although there was no exceedance from impact air quality
monitoring at the nearest monitoring station but still CSJV was reminded to
maintain good site practice for dust suppression (i.e.: water spraying,
covering to earthy stockpile, vehicle washing, etc.) The complaint case was
found to be project-related. |
|||
|
14-30598 |
8/12/2014 |
MTR
Contract No. 1108 |
Kaden-CW
JV |
Complainant said the dust emission was observed
during loading and unloading the cement. |
Complaint
cases referred to the Contractor. Investigation was conducted by the Contract
ET and the findings shown that insufficient wheel washing was provided at
Gate 1 during peak hours. The
following mitigation measures were implemented by the Contractor. -
Site hoarding was erected along the site
boundary adjacent to Concorde Road; -
The main haul road leading to the site
exit at Concorde Road was paved with concrete; -
Wheel washing bay and high pressure water
jets were provided at Gate 1 for washing off the soil and dirt from the
vehicles and wheels before leaving the site; -
The wastewater in the bay was collected by
suction truck; -
Water truck was assigned for cleaning and
wetting the haul road; -
General worker was assigned for cleaning
the dirt near the site exit at Concorde road; -
The load of dump trucks was covered with
tarpaulin before leaving the site The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|
14-31762 |
22/12/2014 |
Complainant said the dust emission was observed
near Concorde Road due to not sufficient water spraying activities inside the
site. The dump truck leaving the site was not clean enough. |
|
14-31933 |
23/12/2014 |
MTR Contract No. 1109 |
Samsung-Hsin Chong JV |
Complainant said the hoarding of the construction
site was not found/ below standard. Dust emission and noise nuisance was
found at the nearby area. |
Complaint cases referred to the Contractor.
Investigation was conducted by the Contract ET and site hoarding of not less
than 2.4 m tall was observed provided at site boundary of the site during
site inspection on 29 December 2014. The impact noise and dust data recorded
adjacent to Sung Wong Toi works area on 24 and 30 December 2014 have been
reviewed and no action/limit level was triggered. The complaint case was
found to be non-project-related. |
Closed |
|
14-32138 |
29/12/2014 |
Complaint about the dust emission from the nearby
construction site and enquiry about the concrete batching plant inside Kai
Tak Area. |
Complaint cases referred to the Contractor.
Investigation was conducted by the Contract ET at the construction site
(including the concrete batching plant) on 29 December 2014. No adverse
observation on dust aspect was recorded. The impact noise and dust data recorded adjacent
to Sung Wong Toi works area on 24 and 30 December 2014 have been reviewed and
no action/limit level was triggered. The complaint case was found to be
non-project-related. |
|||
|
14-31762 |
8/12/2014 |
CEDD
Contract No. KL/2012/02 |
Kaden
Construction Limited |
Complainant said the dust emission was observed
near Concorde Road due to not sufficient water spraying activities inside the
site. The dump truck leaving the site was not clean enough. |
Complaint case referred to the Contractor. The
source of construction dust was found coming from the vehicles leaving Gate 1
(Managed by MTRC 1108 construction site). Follow up actions referred to MTRC
Contract 1108. The complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|
14-30597 |
22/12/2014 |
Complainant said the soil/ muddy water was found
around the Concorde Road. |
Complaint case referred to the Contractor. The
source of the mud was found coming from the vehicles leaving Gate 1 (Managed
by MTRC 1108 construction site). Follow up actions referred to MTRC Contract
1108. The complaint case was found to be
project-related. |
|||
|
14-31547 |
18/12/2014 |
Site 1I1 was handed over from CEDD Contract No.
KL/2010/03 to DLO on 9 December 2013 and therefore the captioned case is not
related to CEDD Contract No. KL/2010/03. |
AP
and the developer |
Playing the R/C vehicles inside the Site 1I1
construction site generate noise. |
According to the investigation by the Engineering
team, some general public had gained access to Site 1I1 through the man gate
located at Muk On Street (public road) and played remote control cars at Site
1I1. As the Site 1I1 has been handed over from CEDD Contract No. KL/2010/03
to DLO on 9 December 2013 and therefore the captioned case is not related to
CEDD Contract No. KL/2010/03. CEDD has been referred this case to the AP and
the developer for follow-up. The complaint case was found to be non-project
related. |
Closed |
|
14-30297 |
3/12/2014 |
STT
No. KX2575 |
Gee Lee
Transportation Co |
Complaint of construction activity after 7:00pm
during weekdays and morning on Sunday. |
The noise source in concern was from the
warehouse / car park in Kai Tak (KX2575). The premise owner clarified that no
construction activities were conducted after 7:00pm during weekdays and on
Sunday. Advice was given to the said premises. The complaint case was found
to be non-project-related. |
Closed |
|
15-00506 |
7/1/2015 |
MTR
Contract No. 1108 |
Kaden-CW
JV |
Complainant alleged that sand and mud were
brought to the road surface by the construction vehicles left from gate 1 of
the construction sites. |
Complaint case referred to the Contractor.
Investigation was conducted by the Contract ET and the findings shown that
insufficient wheel washing was provided at Gate 1 during peak hours. The following mitigation measures were
implemented by the Contractor. -
The time for wheel washing was extended
for more thorough cleaning; -
Staffs were further instructed to ensure
all vehicles were thoroughly cleaned and the load of dump trucks were
properly covered before leaving the site; -
A penalty mechanism was adapted to prevent
unwashed dump trucks leaving the site; -
Improvement work for the wheel washing bay
at Gate 1 was carried out. The complaint
case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|
15-01573 |
20/1/2015 |
Complainant alleged that sand and mud were
brought to the road surface by the construction vehicles left from gate 1 of
the construction sites. |
||||
|
15-04114 |
16/2/2015 |
HKHA
Contract No. 20140264 |
Tysan
Foundation Limited |
Complainant alleged that loud percussive piling
noise from the construction site affecting his daily life. |
The complaint was referred to the Contractor. The
Contractor clarified that all piling works were conducted within the time
periods stated in the CNP. Noise barriers were erected along the site
boundary and membranes were provided to driving hammers to mitigate the noise
impact. No breach of CNP conditions was identified. Regular noise monitoring will be carried out around
the site during construction period (12:00-14:00 & 15:30-18:30) to
monitor the noise nuisance from construction works and ensure compliance with
CNP conditions. The complaint case was found to be
project-related. |
Closed |
|
15-04622 |
26/2/2015 |
CEDD
Contract No. KL/2011/01 |
Chit
Cheung Construction Co Ltd |
Complainant alleged that the noise from the
construction site affecting his/her daily life. Complainant also alleged that dust emission from
the construction site affecting his/her daily life. |
The complaint case was referred to the Contractor.
The Contractor has been replied the complaint to EPD on 12 March 2015.
According to the Contractor’s investigation, the percussive works had been
finished in late January 2015 and there was no percussive piling works in
February 2015. Regarding to the said
percussive piling works, the Contractor has obtained the CNP (PP-RE0074-14)
for percussive piling works from 20 December 2014 to 15 June 2015. Regarding to the dust issue, the two stockpiles
were well covered by dust screen and provided with automatic water sprinklers
system, which can mitigate any dust emission nuisance in the vicinity. The complaint case was found to be
project-related. |
Closed |
|
ASD
Contract No. |
Dragages
HK Ltd |
The
complaint case was referred to the Contractor. Investigation was conducted by
the Contractor. According to investigation
results, 95% of the construction activities have been E&M services
installation and interior renovations since February 2015, which are confined
inside the building. They have been fully enclosed by curtain walls of the
building tower. No dust and noise nuisance to the public was expected to be
resulted from these activities. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|||
|
MTR
Contract No. 1107 |
CW-SELI
JV |
Complaint
cases referred to the Contractor. Investigation was conducted by the Contract
ET. According to investigation results, no major dusty works were conducted
on the complaint date and proper mitigation measures were implemented. The construction
work under Contract no. 1107 complied with CNP conditions (Permit No.: GW-RE1496-14;
GW-RE0085-15; GE-RE0158-15). Regular
air quality monitoring was conducted in February 2015. No Limit Level exceedance
for the air quality and noise monitoring result was recorded in February
2015. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|||
|
MTR
Contract No. 1108 |
Kaden-CW
JV |
The
complaint case was referred to the Contractor. Investigation was carried out
by the Contract ET. No major noise source was identified. Cement mixing was
identified as the major dust source. Proper
dust mitigation measures for cement mixing and exposed stockpiles were
implemented. The Contractor was reminded to keep up the mitigation measures. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|||
|
CEDD
Contract No. KL/2012/02 |
Kaden
Construction Limited |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor.
Investigation was conducted by the Contract ET. According to
investigation results, major
construction activities conducted in late February 2015 include: -
Road and drainage work in San Po Kong; -
Road surfacing at Concorde Road; -
Soft landscaping works in Kai Tak Area;
and -
Excavation at Prince Edward Road East VT1. Construction noise
and dust emission
from the above
construction activities was expected to be minimal with implemented
air quality and noise mitigation measures. Air
quality and noise monitoring was conducted at nearby ASRs and NSRs as stipulated in the EM&A manual during
February 2015. No exceedance of Action/Limit Level for the air quality and no
Limit Level exceedance for noise monitoring result was recorded in February
2015. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|||
|
EMSD
Contract No. 1020EM12A |
Wo
Hing Construction Co Ltd |
Complaint
cases referred to the Contractor.
Investigation conducted by the Contractor. Construction works under
Contract no. 1020EM12A in the complaint period was reviewed and no major
dusty works were identified. Major
noise source was identified as generators and crane lorries which would not
affect daily life of residents nearby. The complaint
case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|
15-05127 |
3/3/2015 |
MTR
Contract No. 1108A |
Concentric
- Hong Kong River JV |
Complainant quoted that noise generated from the
construction work at the barge point affecting his/her health. |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Investigation was conducted by the Contract
ET. Investigation results shown that no
major construction works under Contract 1108A was conducted during the
complaint date except normal operation of barge facilities. The barging
operation complied with CNP conditions (Permit No.: GW-RE1017-14) and no
construction activity was carried out within the site area after 11:00 pm
since the commencement of the project.
The
environmental conditions of the site and effectiveness of the implementation
of mitigation measures will be continuously reviewed and monitored by the
Resident Site Staff and the Contract ET. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|
15-06697 |
22/3/2015 |
URA
Contract No. NKIL6515 |
Bordon
Construction Co Ltd |
Complainant alleged that there had some noise
from the construction sites affecting his/her daily life on Sunday. |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Investigation was conducted by the
Contractor. The results showed that no PME and prescribed construction
activities were conducted on the date of complaint. Sub-contractors are
required to apply for working permit if they have to work during restricted
hours. Foremen and safety practitioners have site inspection and take records
every 2 hours to monitor the noise condition on general holidays. Weekly
noise control records were checked and no non-compliances were recorded. The
complaint case was found to be non-project-related. |
Closed |
|
15-07237 |
27/3/2015 |
K&K Property
Contract No. NKIL6525 |
Simon & Sons
Engineering Ltd |
Complainant
alleged that the percussive piling noise from the construction site affecting
his/her daily life. |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Follow-up action pending from the
Contractor. |
Follow-up |
|
KWIH Contract
No. NKIL6526 |
New Concepts
Foundation Ltd |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. The Contractor clarified that the percussive
piling was carried out at the captioned site are in compliance with the
conditions set out in CNP and other relevant statutory regulations. No
non-compliance was found during the investigation. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|||
|
Poly Property
Contract No. NKIL6527 |
K. H.
Foundations Ltd |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Investigation was conducted by the
Contractor. The
Contractor clarified that no pile would be driven at time between 07:00 and
08:00. H-pile driving hours were re-arranged to minimize driven the H-piles
concurrently with the other three sites nearby. All power generator deployed
on site are silent types with QPME certificates. All subcontractors were
required to comply with the requirement of the granted CNP (PP-RE0003-15). No
breach of CNP conditions during the complaint period. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|||
|
Wheelock
Properties Contract No. NKIL6541 |
Konwall
Construction & Engineering Co Ltd |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Investigation was conducted by the
Contractor. The Contractor clarified
that only a test pile installation (1 no. of pile) required by the Buildings
Department was being carried out during the complained period. Impervious
covering was provided to the site hoarding to reduce noise nuisance. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|||
|
15-07297 |
30/3/2015 |
MTR
Contract No. 1108A |
Concentric
- Hong Kong River JV |
Complainant quoted that dust generated from the
transportation of sand and mud to the barge point affecting his/her health;
no water spraying was found; the stockpiles was not covered properly; and the
construction waste was disposed everywhere in Kai Tak |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Investigation was conducted by the Contract
ET. According to the investigation results, the major construction activities
conducted in late March 2015 include: 1. Daily
operation and maintenance of the Barging Point Facilities to receive
excavated spoil delivered by Designated and Interfacing Contracts; 2. Temporary
stockpiling of received spoil in the Barging Point Facilities; and 3. Marine
transportation of received spoil to receptor sites for beneficial reuse. Dust
emission from the above construction activities was expected to be minimal
with implemented dust mitigation measures. It is also noted that the entire
driveway within the barging point is fully paved with concrete. The
Contractor had implemented the dust mitigation measures in accordance with
the requirement of EP condition (i.e. 2.18 (a) and 2.18 (c)) and
Specification of this Project as below: For
the unloading of spoil from trucks at barging point, 3-sided screen with top
tipping hall and operating water spray and flexible dust curtains were
provided at the discharge point for dust suppression; Dust
enclosures were provided for the conveyor belt system with providing water
spray at the loading point to suppress the dust emission from the
transportation of spoils on vessel and the stockpile on vessel; Stockpile
of dusty material were sprayed with water regularly to remain the surface wet; Water
spraying was provided to the paved driveway within the barging point for
suppression of fugitive dust. For
construction waste, only small amount of construction waste was generated
from daily operation of Barging Point Facilities. All the construction waste
was disposed to the designated landfill (NENT) and no construction waste were
disposed in Kai Tak Area. The construction waste disposal activities in Kai
Tak Area outside the site boundary of this Contract were not related to this
Contract. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|
MTR Contract No. 1109 |
Samsung-Hsin Chong JV |
Complaint case referred to the Contractor.
Investigation was conducted by the Contract ET. According to the
investigation results, regular watering of site haul road and stockpiling
area was implemented during site operation time. All construction waste generated from SCL1109 has
been disposed off-site properly following the prevailing legal and
contractual requirements. The complaint case was found to be
project-related. |
Closed |
|||
|
15-07426 |
30/3/2015 |
ASD
Contract No. |
Dragages
HK Ltd |
Complainant alleged that the lighting from
T&I Tower affecting his/her daily life. |
The complaint was referred to the Contractor.
Investigation was conducted by the Contractor. The results showed that no spot light was
in place at the alignment of TITKT site towards Prince Edward Road East.
However the lights inside the TITKT Main Tower remained on at night for
commissioning test and for illumination to support work activities, such as
cable termination and connection, inside the building at night time. To mitigate the possible nuisance, except for the
emergency lightings, DHK had requested sub-contractors to turn off the lights
for illumination inside the TITKT Tower after the night works, since 3 April
2015. The complaint case was found to be
project-related. |
Closed |
|
15-07466 |
27/3/2015 |
COHL
Contract No. NKIL6516 & 6517 |
Tysan
Foundation Limited |
Complainant alleged that the percussive piling
noise from the construction site affecting his/her daily life. Complainant
also alleged that dust emission from the construction site affecting his/her
daily life. |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. According to the investigation results, ELS,
pile cap and basement slab works were carrying out during the complaint
period. All the construction works are carrying out in daytime (i.e. 7am to
7pm), except emergency matter; Frequent
dust depression activities were conducting including watering of site area
and wheel washing for vehicles leaving the site. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|
K&K
Property Contract No. NKIL6525 |
Simon
& Sons Engineering Ltd |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Follow-up action pending from the
Contractor. |
Follow-up |
|||
|
KWIH
Contract No. NKIL6526 |
New
Concepts Foundation Ltd |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. The Contractor clarified that percussive
piling was carried out at the captioned site are in compliance with the
conditions set out in CNP and other relevant statutory regulations. No
non-compliance was found during the investigation. Water
spray was provided for the captioned site to reduce dust emission. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|||
|
Poly
Property Contract No. NKIL6527 |
K. H.
Foundations Ltd |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Investigation was conducted by the
Contractor. The
Contractor clarified that no pile would be driven at time between 07:00 and
08:00. H-pile driving hours were re-arranged to minimize driven the H-piles
concurrently with the other three sites nearby. All power generator deployed
on site are silent types with QPME certificates. All subcontractors were
required to comply with the requirement of the granted CNP (PP-RE0003-15). No
breach of CNP conditions during the complaint period. Dust
mitigation measures were provided on site including watering of site. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|
|
|
Wheelock
Properties Contract No. NKIL6541 |
Konwall
Construction & Engineering Co Ltd |
|
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Investigation was conducted by the
Contractor. The Contractor clarified
that only a test pile installation (1 no. of pile) required by the Buildings
Department was being carried out during the complained period. Impervious
covering was provided to the site hoarding to reduce noise nuisance. Dust
emission was controlled to a minimum by watering of site and set up of
polythene sheet along the site boundary. The
complaint case was found to be project-related. |
Closed |
|
15-08093 |
9/4/2015 |
K&K
Property Contract No. NKIL6525 |
Simon
& Sons Engineering Ltd |
Complainant alleged that the percussive piling
noise from the construction site affecting his/her daily life. |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Follow-up action pending from the
Contractor. |
Follow-up |
|
15-08918 |
16/4/2015 |
K&K
Property Contract No. NKIL6525 |
Simon
& Sons Engineering Ltd |
Noise from the piling work was annoying him/her. Complainant
requested provide reductive measures such as noise barriers to reduce the
noise level. |
Complaint
case referred to the Contractor. Follow-up action pending from the
Contractor. |
Follow-up |